Ein Mail an Peter Lorange
Betreff: werbung unter ihrer verantwortlichkeit
thank you for explanations. i imagine, that you have found a lot of
problems that must be solved within gsba. i wonder if 100 days are enough...
during the due diligence (that must have taken place before the purchase
of the company), the different problems within the company must have been
part of the list. and if you compare the procedures that were applied when
the company should have been sold in 2005 with the present situation you
will see, that at that time the potential buyers asked for confirmations
showing that cases like for example jaqueline fendt have been settled
before they take over.
and ... you can be held responsible for the past, because it is the
company that is responsible. if for example you receive a tax bill,
because a board member in previous years delcared profits that were taken
out of the company as a salary, then you will not be able to tell the tax
man, that you are not responsible for the penalty the company might face.
if you are faced with students that state, that the value of the diplomas
they received does not correspond with the promises made at the time when
they signed the contract, then it is the company that is held responsible.
some things should therefore better be compared to when you buy a second
hand car. if you find out after the first time sitting in the car, that it
is in a bad ship-shape then you better have them done immediately. i.e.
you better fix your blinker if it blinks on the right side when you intend
to turn to the left, because you might end up in an accident before 100
days are over. people with an old british driving licence might solve the
problem by showing where they want to go to by waving the arm... but when
it comes to brakes not functioning, then ... (if i buy a second-hand car i
remember the words a comedian said with reference to nixon).
if you look at how true and reliable the informations from horgen are and
were (regardless if we talk about figures established by beat herren oder
statements from dmt treuhand or news letters from lucia peters or
info-sheets that lead you to carl jung) and then read the communication
regarding the sale of gsba, you will see: is not clear.
so, if we stay with comparing with cars, a mercedes or a smart will always
be compared with the "elch test", and some italian makes are
immediatley thought as to be full of rust.
regarding info of sale of gsba: you can't buy a gsba, because gsba does
you can't buy a gsba graduate school of business administration oekreal
foundation, because a foundation belongs to no one
so, when looking though the list of companies, the most possible thing
that was sold is oekreal ag.
but... there are also other companies involved, such as gsba immobilien ag
(that sometime is consolidated as a 100% ownership, but is not), the IFMA,
and some more foundations. so when i read that gsba has been purchased by
peter lorange it is obvious, that i do not believe in such kind of
and when it comes to communications and promises that are made today to
people singning into new courses, i would compare it to a car without
i wish you a sunny day and a nice weekend